ABSTRACT
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS & METHODS
Subjects
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Cognitive and Therapeutic Evaluations
- Trivedi MH
- Rush AJ
- Ibrahim HM
- Carmody TJ
- Biggs MM
- Suppes T
- et al.
EEG
MRI
E-field Modeling
Statistical Analysis
Ebrain Linear Models | Results | |
---|---|---|
Letter Fluency ∼ Ebrain + tx_number + Sex + TOPF | R2 = 0.13, ß = -0.10, t22 = -2.73, p = 0.013* | |
Category Fluency ∼ Ebrain + tx_number + Sex + TOPF | R2 = 0.58, ß = -0.16, t22 = -5.41, p = 2.3e-05* | |
Depression Score ∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.13, ß = -0.0004, t22 = -0.122, p = 0.90 | |
Ictal Theta Power Linear Models (4-8Hz) | Earliest Suprathreshold Treatment | Suprathreshold Treatment Averages |
Fp1 ∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.32, ß = 1.002, t23 = 2.87, p = 0.009* | R2 = 0.63, ß = 0.54, t23 = 2.52, p = 0.02* |
Fp2 ∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.38, ß = 1.13, t23 = 3.44, p = 0.002* | R2 = 0.67, ß = 0.47, t23 = 2.41, p = 0.02* |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.07, ß = -0.045, t21 = -2.37, p = 0.03* | R2 = 0.35, ß = -0.07, t21 = -4.08, p = 0.0005* |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.17, ß = -0.05, t21 = -2.94, p = 0.008* | R2 = 0.45, ß = -0.08, t21 = -4.87, p = 8.2e-05* |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.19, ß = -0.05, t21 = -2.30, p = 0.03* | R2 = 0.24, ß = -0.06, t21 = -2.67, p = 0.01* |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.22, ß = -0.06, t21 = -2.50, p = 0.02* | R2 = 0.21, ß = -0.06, t21 = -2.48, p = 0.02* |
Depression Score ∼ Fp1 + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.04, ß = 0.003, t23 = 2.03, p = 0.05* | R2 = 0.02, ß = 0.005, t23 = 1.83, p = 0.08 |
Depression Score ∼ Fp2 + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.14, ß = 0.004, t23 = 2.64, p = 0.01* | R2 = 0.15, ß = 0.008, t23 = 2.72, p = 0.01* |
RESULTS
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics | N=27 |
---|---|
Age | 56.5 (12.7) |
Sex: male/female | 9/18 |
TOPF (n=26) | 113 (11.0) |
Baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment | 24.3 (4.1) |
Ebrain, mean (SD) | 122.5 (18.5) |
Baseline Inventory of Depression Scale | 48.3 (9.2) |
RUL ECT Change in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology | 43.7% (29.1%) |
Change in Letter Fluency | -2.1 (3.5) |
Change in Category Fluency | -2.6 (3.9) |
Seizure Length | 44.4 (21.0) |
Fp1 ictal theta power | 86.0 (37.6) |
Fp2 ictal theta power | 77.5 (37.0) |
Fp1 ictal theta power intrasubject average | 83.2 (29.7) |
Fp2 ictal theta power intrasubject average | 76.2 (28.5) |
RUL only/bitemporal switch | 19/8 |
RUL Responder | 10/19 |
RUL Remitter | 7/19 |
RUL suprathreshold treatment number captured by EEG | 2.4 (0.7) |
Total RUL treatment numbers received | 6.2 (2.0) |
RUL only Responder and Remitter Rate (n=19) | 89.47% |
Overall Responder and Remitter Rate (Including bitemporal switchers) | 70.37% |
Longitudinal and Frequency Analysis

Ebrain and Clinical Outcomes

Ebrain and Ictal Power

Ictal Power Linear Models | Frequency Band: delta (1.4-4Hz) | Frequency Band: Alpha (8-13Hz) |
---|---|---|
Fp1 Ictal Power∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.25, ß = 1.72, t23 = 2.50, p= 0.02) | R2 = 0.27, ß = 1.38, t23 = 3.08, p = 0.005* |
Fp2 Ictal Power ∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.28, ß = 1.76, t23 = 2.62, p= 0.02) | R2 = 0.35, ß = 1.21, t23 = 3.67, p = 0.001* |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = -0.01, ß = -0.02, t21 = -1.82, p= 0.08) | R2 = 0.005, ß = -0.03, t21 = -1.94, p = 0.07 |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.02, ß = -0.02, t21 = -2.06, p= 0.05) | R2 = 0.09, ß = -0.05, t21 = -2.46, p = 0.02 |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.13, ß = -2.67, t21 = -1.91, p= 0.07) | R2 = 0.12, ß = -0.03, t21 = -1.78, p = 0.09 |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.13, ß = -2.67, t21 = -1.90, p= 0.07) | R2 = 0.15, ß = -0.04, t21 = -2.05, p = 0.05 |
Depression Score ∼ Fp1 + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.007, ß = 0.001, t23 = 1.65, p= 0.10) | R2 = -0.05, ß = 0.001, t23 = 1.24, p = 0.23 |
Depression Score ∼ Fp2 + Age + Sex | R2 = 0.03, ß = 0.002, t23 = 1.92, p= 0.07) | R2 = 0.005, ß = 0.003, t23 = 1.74, p = 0.10 |
Ictal Power Linear Models | Frequency Band: Beta (13-30Hz) | Frequency Band: Gamma(30-48Hz) |
Fp1 Ictal Power∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.03, ß = -0.009, t23 = -0.10, p = 0.35 | R2 = 0.02, ß = -0.48, t23 = -1.90, p = 0.07 |
Fp2 Ictal Power∼ Ebrain + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.02, ß = -0.002, t23 = -0.20, p = 0.84 | R2 = 0.06, ß = -5.54, t23 = -2.06, p = 0.05 |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = -0.14, ß = 0.72, t21 = 0.75, p = 0.46 | R2 = -0.12 ß = 0.003, t21 = 1.03, p = 0.32 |
Letter Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = -0.16, ß = 0.50, t21 = 0.60, p = 0.56 | R2 = -0.16, ß = 0.002, t21 = 0.56, p = 0.58 |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp1 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.11, ß = -2.52, t21 = -1.73, p = 0.09 | R2 = 0.04, ß = 0.003, t21 = 1.08, p = 0.29 |
Category Fluency ∼ Fp2 + TOPF + Sex + tx_number | R2 = 0.12, ß = -2.57, t21 = -1.80, p = 0.08 | R2 = 0.03, ß = 0.003, t21 = 1.01, p = 0.33 |
Depression Score ∼ Fp1 + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.10, ß = 0.05, t23 = -0.70, p = 0.49 | R2 = -0.01, ß = 0.0004, t23 = -1.62, p = 0.12 |
Depression Score ∼ Fp2 + Age + Sex | R2 = -0.08, ß = 0.07, t23 = -0.95, p = 0.35 | R2 = 0.03, ß = -0.0004, t23 = -1.95, p = 0.06 |
Ictal Power and Clinical Outcomes
Ictal Power and Dichotomous Outcomes (+/- responder; +/- cognitive impairment):
Ebrain, Ictal Theta Power, and Seizure Length
DISCUSSION
Acknowledgments
References
- Is a grandmal seizure necessary and sufficient for the efficacy of electro convulsive therapy?.Indian J Psychiatry. 2000; 42: 57-59
- A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000; 57: 425-434
- The ictal EEG in ECT: A systematic review of the relationships between ictal features, ECT technique, seizure threshold and outcomes.Brain Stimul. 2020; 13: 1644-1654
- Prediction of antidepressant response in both 2.25xthreshold RUL and fixed high dose RUL ECT.J Affect Disord. 2009; 112: 85-91
- Seizure expression during electroconvulsive therapy: relationships with clinical outcome and cognitive side effects.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004; 29: 813-825
- Quantitative EEG during seizures induced by electroconvulsive therapy: relations to treatment modality and clinical features. II. Topographic analyses.J ECT. 2000; 16: 229-243
- The effects of electroconvulsive therapy on quantitative electroencephalograms. Relationship to clinical outcome.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996; 53: 814-824
- Quantitative EEG during seizures induced by electroconvulsive therapy: relations to treatment modality and clinical features. I. Global analyses.J ECT. 2000; 16: 211-228
- Ictal electroencephalographic correlates of posttreatment neuropsychological changes in electroconvulsive therapy: a hypothesis-generation study.J ECT. 2007; 23: 163-168
- Comparison of seizure duration, ictal EEG, and cognitive effects of ketamine and methohexital anesthesia with ECT.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003; 15: 27-34
- A Retrospective Study of Postictal Suppression during Electroconvulsive Therapy.J Clin Med. 2022; 11
- Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-a fully automated open-source pipeline.J Neural Eng. 2019; 16056006
- Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS?.2015 Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015; : 222-225
- Electric field causes volumetric changes in the human brain.Elife. 2019; 8
- Electric field strength induced by electroconvulsive therapy is associated with clinical outcome.Neuroimage Clin. 2021; 30102581
- Electroconvulsive therapy, electric field, neuroplasticity, and clinical outcomes.Mol Psychiatry. 2022; 27: 1676-1682
- Ictal Theta Power as an Electroconvulsive Therapy Safety Biomarker: A Pilot Study.J ECT. 2022; 38: 88-94
Abbott CC, Deng Z-D, Argyelan M, Ryman S, McClintock SM (2021): Prelminary Results for ECT Amplitude-Determined Seizure Titration to Improve Clinical Outcomes. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Neuropsychopharmacology, pp 519-553.
- Multifactorial determinants of the neurocognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy.J ECT. 2014; 30: 165-176
- The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation.Psychol Med. 2004; 34: 73-82
- Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: an update.J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10: 301-303
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Pulse Amplitude and Clinical Outcomes.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021; 29: 166-178
- The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53: 695-699
Wechsler D (2009): Test of Premorbid Functioning. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonion, TX.
- Intraclass correlations of seizure duration by wavelet transform, sample entropy, and visual determination in electroconvulsive therapy.Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020; 40: 102-106
- Wavelet-based EEG processing for computer-aided seizure detection and epilepsy diagnosis.Seizure. 2015; 26: 56-64
- Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.Neuroimage. 2004; 23: S208-219
- Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.Neuroimage. 2018; 174: 587-598
Friston KJ (2007): Statistical Parametric Mapping: The analysis of funtional brain images. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.
Team R (2020): RStudio: Integrated Development for R. . RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA.
Team RC (2020): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Wickham H (2016): ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Verlag New York: Springer.
- Factors Predicting Ictal Quality in Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Sessions.Brain Sci. 2021; 11
- Evaluation of cumulative cognitive deficits from electroconvulsive therapy.Br J Psychiatry. 2016; 208: 266-270
- Evidence for spreading seizure as a cause of theta-alpha activity electrographic pattern in stereo-EEG seizure recordings.PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17e1008731
- The Theta Rhythm of the Hippocampus: From Neuronal and Circuit Mechanisms to Behavior.Front Cell Neurosci. 2021; 15649262
- Hippocampal volume changes following electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017; 2: 327-335
- Central-positive complexes in ECT-induced seizures: Possible evidence for thalamocortical mechanisms.Clin Neurophysiol. 2023; 146: 77-86
- Anatomy of phonemic and semantic fluency: A lesion and disconnectome study in 1231 stroke patients.Cortex. 2021; 143: 148-163
- Letter and Category Fluency Performance Correlates with Distinct Patterns of Cortical Thickness in Older Adults.Cereb Cortex. 2019; 29: 2694-2700
- Electric field distribution models in ECT research.Mol Psychiatry. 2022;
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Authors’ contributions: JM and CA conceptualized manuscript and completed the initial draft of manuscript. JM, TJ, JU, CA did data retrieval and analysis. All authors reviewed final draft.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy