Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Introduction
Methods and Materials
Participants
Procedure
MMN Paradigms
EEG Acquisition and Processing
Analyses
Results
Demographics
HC (n=105) | ESZ (n=89) | |
---|---|---|
Demographics | ||
Gender (% male / female) | 58.10 / 41.90 | 70.71 / 29.29 |
Age (Range: 12-36) | 23.01 ± 6.35 | 22.48 ± 4.24 |
Ethnicity (%) | ||
American Indian / Alaska Native | 2.88 | 0.00 |
Asian American | 17.14 | 25.84 |
Black / African American | 5.71 | 4.49 |
More Than One Race | 12.38 | 13.48 |
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander | 0.00 | 1.12 |
White / Caucasian | 60.95 | 51.69 |
Not Reported | 0.95 | 3.37 |
Medication (%) | ||
Chlorpromazine equivalents (mg) | --- | 301.54 ± 332.75a |
Antipsychotic medication | --- | 88.76 |
(typical, atypical, unknown) | --- | (1.27, 94.94, 3.80) |
Clinical Symptom Severity | ||
PANSS Positive | --- | 14.05 ± 5.04 |
PANSS Negative | --- | 16.84 ± 6.48 |
PANSS General | --- | 33.36 ± 8.86 |
MMN Amplitude
Effect | F | p | Partial eta2 | Follow-Up Tests |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group | 8.610 | .004 | .043 | HC<ESZ |
Deviant Type | 0.319 | .723 | .002 | |
Fronto-Central Lead | 1.906 | .169 | .010 | |
Group*Deviant Type | 1.019 | .361 | .005 | |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.694 | .406 | .004 | |
Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 8.298 | .000 | .041 | |
Fronto-Central Lead Effect for Duration-Deviants | 0.744 | .390 | .004 | |
Fronto-Central Lead Effect for Pitch-Deviants | 0.017 | .898 | .000 | |
Fronto-Central Lead Effect for Double-Deviants | 10.056 | .002 | .050 | F>C |
Deviant Type Effect at Frontal Leads | 1.061 | .348 | .011 | |
Deviant Type Effect at Central Leads | 0.487 | .615 | .005 | |
Group*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 6.320 | .002 | .032 | |
Group Effect for Duration Deviants at Frontal Leads | 2.108 | .148 | .011 | |
Group Effect for Duration-Deviants at Central Leads | 4.213 | .041 | .021 | HC<ESZ |
Group Effect for Pitch-Deviants at Frontal Leads | 7.487 | .007 | .038 | HC<ESZ |
Group Effect for Pitch-Deviants at Central Leads | 7.320 | .007 | .037 | HC<ESZ |
Group Effect for Double-Deviants at Frontal Leads | 10.380 | .001 | .051 | HC<ESZ |
Group Effect for Double-Deviants at Central Leads | 3.989 | .047 | .020 | HC<ESZ |

Theta ITC and Power
Effect | F | p | Partial eta2 | Follow-Up Tests |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group | 7.658 | .006 | .038 | HC>ESZ |
Stimulus Type | 0.114 | .736 | .001 | |
Deviant Type | 0.669 | .497 | .003 | |
Fronto-Central Lead | 0.030 | .863 | .000 | |
Group*Stimulus Type | 0.010 | .921 | .000 | |
Group*Deviant Type | 1.626 | .201 | .008 | |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.037 | .848 | .000 | |
Stimulus Type*Deviant Type | 2.790 | .069 | .014 | |
Stimulus Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 2.557 | .111 | .013 | |
Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 1.028 | .355 | .005 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Deviant Type | 0.791 | .442 | .004 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.320 | .572 | .002 | |
Group*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.113 | .880 | .001 | |
Stimulus Type*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 2.349 | .098 | .012 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 4.533 | .012 | .023 | |
Group Effect for Standards Averaged Over Deviant Types at Frontal Leads | 4.289 | .040 | .022 | HC>ESZ |
Group Effect for Standards Averaged Over Deviant Types at Central Leads | 5.342 | .022 | .027 | HC>ESZ |
Group Effect for Duration-Deviants at Frontal Leads | 4.777 | .030 | .024 | HC>ESZ |
Group Effect for Duration-Deviants at Central Leads | 8.198 | .005 | .041 | HC>ESZ |
Group Effect for Pitch-Deviants at Frontal Leads | 1.675 | .197 | .009 | |
Group Effect for Pitch-Deviants at Central Leads | 0.609 | .436 | .003 | |
Group Effect for Double-Deviants at Frontal Leads | 1.506 | .221 | .008 | |
Group Effect for Double-Deviants at Central Leads | 0.407 | .524 | .002 |
Effect | F | p | Partial eta2 | Follow-Up Tests |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group | 3.795 | .053 | .019 | |
Stimulus Type | 1.528 | .218 | .008 | |
Deviant Type | 0.451 | .627 | .002 | |
Fronto-Central Lead | 0.438 | .509 | .002 | |
Group*Stimulus Type | 1.622 | .204 | .008 | |
Group*Deviant Type | 0.389 | .670 | .002 | |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.974 | .325 | .005 | |
Stimulus Type*Deviant Type | 0.102 | .902 | .001 | |
Stimulus Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 2.904 | .090 | .015 | |
Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.301 | .739 | .002 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Deviant Type | 0.628 | .533 | .003 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 4.302 | .039 | .022 | |
Group Effect for Standards at Frontal Leads | 0.683 | .409 | .004 | |
Group Effect for Standards at Central Leads | 0.173 | .678 | .001 | |
Group Effect for Deviants at Frontal Leads | 1.966 | .162 | .010 | |
Group Effect for Deviants at Central Leads | 6.320 | .013 | .032 | HC>ESZ |
Group*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.460 | .631 | .002 | |
Stimulus Type*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.260 | .771 | .001 | |
Group*Stimulus Type*Deviant Type*Fronto-Central Lead | 0.797 | .450 | .004 |
MMN Correlations with Theta ITC and Power
ANCOVA Tests of Group Effects

Associations with Clinical Measures and Antipsychotic Dosage
Discussion
Acknowledgments
Supplementary Material
References
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm.Psychophysiology. 1981; 18: 322-330
- Auditory attention and selective input modulation: A topographical ERP study.Neuroreport. 1992; 3: 493-496
- Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence.Psychophysiology. 2005; 42: 25-32
- Subanesthetic effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans. Psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994; 51: 199-214
- Capturing the angel in "angel dust": Twenty years of translational neuroscience studies of NMDA receptor antagonists in animals and humans.Schizophr Bull. 2012; 38: 942-949
- Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity dysfunction in schizophrenia.Audiol Neurootol. 2000; 5: 207-215
- Mismatch negativity as a biomarker of theta band oscillatory dysfunction in schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2018; 191: 51-60
- Associated deficits in mismatch negativity generation and tone matching in schizophrenia.Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 1733-1737
- Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients.Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110: 1601-1610
- Making sense of mismatch negativity.Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11: 468
- Generators of electrical and magnetic mismatch responses in humans.Brain Topogr. 1995; 7: 315-320
- Divergent approaches converge on frontal lobe dysfunction in schizophrenia.Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165: 944-948
- Mismatch negativity is a breakthrough biomarker for understanding and treating psychotic disorders.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: 15175-15176
- Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.Brain Topogr. 2014; 27: 451-466
- Neurophysiological models for new treatment development in schizophrenia: early sensory approaches.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015; 1344: 92-104
- Mismatch negativity in response to auditory deviance and risk for future psychosis in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.JAMA Psychiatry. 2022; 79: 780-789
- Automatic auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia and clinical high-risk patients: forecasting psychosis risk with mismatch negativity.Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 75: 459-469
- Prediction of psychosis by mismatch negativity.Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 9: 959-966
- Reduced mismatch negativity predates the onset of psychosis.Schizophr Res. 2012; 134: 42-48
- A meta-analysis of mismatch negativity in schizophrenia: From clinical risk to disease specificity and progression.Biol Psychiatry. 2016; 79: 980-987
- Mismatch negativity in first-episode schizophrenia: A meta-analysis.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2017; 48: 3-10
- Mismatch negativity as a "translatable" brain marker toward early intervention for psychosis: A review.Front Psychiatry. 2013; 4: 115
- Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for translational investigations into early psychosis: A review.Int J Psychophysiol. 2019; 145: 5-14
- Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis.Schizophr Res. 2005; 76: 1-23
- Equivalent mismatch negativity deficits across deviant types in early illness schizophrenia-spectrum patients.Biol Psychol. 2015; 105: 130-137
- Progressive and interrelated functional and structural evidence of post-onset brain reduction in schizophrenia.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 521-529
- Finding the missing-stimulus mismatch negativity (MMN) in early psychosis: Altered MMN to violations of an auditory gestalt.Schizophr Res. 2015; 166: 158-163
- Mismatch negativity-indexed auditory change detection of speech sounds in early and chronic schizophrenia.Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging. 2019; 287: 1-9
- Auditory mismatch negativity and P300a elicited by the “optimal" multi-feature paradigm in early schizophrenia.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2018; 49: 238-247
- Progressive impairment of mismatch negativity is reflective of underlying pathophysiological changes in patients with first-episode psychosis.Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11: 587
- Trait aspects of auditory mismatch negativity predict response to auditory training in individuals with early illness schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol. 2017; 3
- Deviant matters: Duration, frequency, and intensity deviants reveal different patterns of mismatch negativity reduction in early and late schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 63: 58-64
- A tale of two sites: Differential impairment of frequency and duration mismatch negativity across a primarily inpatient versus a primarily outpatient site in schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2018; 191: 10-17
- Differential of frequency and duration mismatch negativity and theta power deficits in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia.Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13: 37
- Stability of mismatch negativity deficits and their relationship to functional impairments in chronic schizophrenia.Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 1741-1743
- Mismatch negativity, social cognition, and functioning in schizophrenia patients.Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67: 940-947
- Mismatch negativity but not P300 is associated with functional disability in schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2018; 44: 492-504
- Neural oscillations and synchrony in brain dysfunction and neuropsychiatric disorders: It's about time.JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72: 840-844
- Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: An overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2008; 34: 907-926
- Memory processes, brain oscillations and EEG synchronization.Int J Psychophysiol. 1996; 24: 61-100
- Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes.Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7: 553-559
- A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9: 474-480
- Neural synchrony in schizophrenia: From networks to new treatments.Schizophr Bull. 2007; 33: 848-852
- Neural synchrony in schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2008; 34: 904-906
- Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans.J Neurosci. 1997; 17: 722-734
- Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993; 86: 283-293
- Rodent mismatch negativity/theta neuro-oscillatory response as a translational neurophysiological biomarker for N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-based new treatment development in schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 43: 571-582
- Developmental trajectory of mismatch negativity and visual event-related potentials in healthy controls: Implications for neurodevelopmental vs. neurodegenerative models of schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2018; 191: 101-108
- Neural mechanisms of mismatch negativity dysfunction in schizophrenia.Mol Psychiatry. 2017; 22: 1585-1593
- Theta oscillation related to the auditory discrimination process in mismatch negativity: oddball versus control paradigm.J Clin Neurol. 2012; 8: 35-42
- Specific early and late oddball-evoked responses in excitatory and inhibitory neurons of mouse auditory cortex.J Neurosci. 2015; 35: 12560-12573
- Somatostatin interneurons control a key component of mismatch negativity in mouse visual cortex.Cell Rep. 2016; 16: 597-604
- NMDA receptor antagonist effects on speech-related mismatch negativity and its underlying oscillatory and source activity in healthy humans.Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10: 455
- EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis.Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29: 169-195
- Control mechanisms in working memory: A possible function of EEG theta oscillations.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 1015-1022
- Theta oscillations in human cortex during a working-memory task: evidence for local generators.J Neurophysiol. 2006; 95: 1630-1638
- Oscillatory underpinnings of mismatch negativity and their relationship with cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.PLoS One. 2013; 8e83255
- Decomposing the constituent oscillatory dynamics underlying mismatch negativity generation in schizophrenia: Distinct relationships to clinical and cognitive functioning.Int J Psychophysiol. 2019; 145: 23-29
- Mismatch negativity and low frequency oscillations in schizophrenia families.Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123: 1980-1988
- Mismatch negativity correlates with delta and theta EEG power in schizophrenia.Int J Neurosci. 2007; 117: 1257-1279
- Temporal and spectral properties of the auditory mismatch negativity and P3a responses in schizophrenia.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022; 15500594221089367
- Deviation from expected cognitive ability is a core cognitive feature of schizophrenia related to neurophysiologic, clinical and psychosocial functioning.Schizophr Res. 2020; 215: 300-307
- Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes.Ear Hear. 1995; 16: 38-51
- Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators.Psychophysiol. 1998; 35: 355-365
- Duration and frequency mismatch negativity in schizophrenia.Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 1054-1065
- Electrophysiological indices of automatic and controlled auditory information processing in first-episode, recent-onset and chronic schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry. 2006; 59: 762-772
- Differential relationships of mismatch negativity and visual p1 deficits to premorbid characteristics and functional outcome in schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry. 2012; 71: 521-529
- Deficits in auditory and visual context-dependent processing in schizophrenia: Defining the pattern.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000; 57: 1131-1137
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB (2002): Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York State Psychiatric Institute: NY: Biometrics Research.
- The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 1987; 13: 261-276
- Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997; 36: 980-988
- Sorted averaging--application to auditory event-related responses.J Neurosci Methods. 2008; 172: 74-78
Ruppert D (2014): Trimming and winsorization. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
- Brain gray and white matter volume loss accelerates with aging in chronic alcoholics: a quantitative MRI study.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992; 16: 1078-1089
Keppel G (1973): Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Prentice Hall.
- Comparing correlated correlation coefficients.Psychol Bull. 1992; 111: 172-175
- Dose equivalents for second-generation antipsychotic drugs: The classical mean dose method.Schizophr Bull. 2015; 41: 1397-1402
- Source generators of mismatch negativity to multiple deviant stimulus types.Brain Topogr. 2001; 14: 117-130
- Precise theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively reduced duration-related mismatch negativity.Biol Psychol. 2018; 137: 125-132
- Reduced auditory evoked potential component N100 in schizophrenia—A critical review.Psychiatry Res. 2008; 161: 259-274
- Dynamic circuit motifs underlying rhythmic gain control, gating and integration.Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 1031-1039
- Target-specific effects of somatostatin-expressing interneurons on neocortical visual processing.J Neurosci. 2013; 33: 19567-19578
- Dissociation of somatostatin and parvalbumin interneurons circuit dysfunctions underlying hippocampal theta and gamma oscillations impaired by amyloid β oligomers in vivo.Brain Struct Func. 2020; 225: 935-954
- Somatostatin neurons govern theta oscillations induced by salient visual signals.Cell Rep. 2020; 33108415
- Complementary control of sensory adaptation by two types of cortical interneurons.Elife. 2015; 4
- The frontal generator of the mismatch negativity revisited.J Psychophysiol. 2007; 21: 188-203
- Ketamine: Differential neurophysiological dynamics in functional networks in the rat brain.Transl Psychiatry. 2017; 7: e1237
- No association between symptom severity and MMN impairment in schizophrenia: A meta-analytic approach.Schizophr Res Cogn. 2017; 9: 13-17
- Effect of aripiprazole on mismatch negativity (MMN) in schizophrenia.PLOS ONE. 2013; 8e52186
- Identifying clinically and functionally distinct groups among healthy controls and first episode psychosis patients by clustering on EEG patterns.Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11541659
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Disclosures
DHM received compensation as a consultant for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cadent Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Gilgamesh Pharma, Recognify Life Sciences, and Syndesi Therapeutics. The other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. JPYH, JMF, and DHM are United States Government employees. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy